Saadat Saeed wrote:
> 
> Yeah my first choice is always a jpg... but in this case a zipped bmp was a
> little more in size with without any loss in quality!

The .zip file was 68 kB. Sure that isn't really big. But I just saved
the 
bmp file with standard settings (75% quality, no smoothing) from xv, and 
the jpg was only 7.8 kB! That's quite a lot smaller, and I can't see any 
difference between the bmp and the jpg.

I don't know what you did, of course; but I often see jpgs which have
been
created with a quality setting close to 100%. This makes the image a lot 
larger but adds very little in quality for most images.

	hp
  
-- 
   _  | Peter J. Holzer             | Think of it as evolution in action
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR                |
| |   | hjp### [at] wsracat               |   -- Tony Rand in "Oath of Fealty"
__/   | http://wsrx.wsr.ac.at/~hjp/ | 	   by Niven & Pournelle

Post a reply to this message